I have come to be quite skeptical
of the way wind power is being sold. I’ve come to agree with much of what
Jonathan Carter, executive director of the Forest Ecology Network, now believes
about mountaintop wind power, after decades of touting it:
No fossil-fuel power plant has ever
been closed because of wind power, and probably never will, given the unreliability
and intermittent nature of wind.
Indeed, reserve plants may need to
be built to provide back-up if dependence on wind grows.
Fossil-fuel plants need to be
cycled down when wind capacity is high, thus increasing their already poor
efficiency ratings and actually increasing CO2 emission.
Mountaintops must be cleared of
trees, roads built, power lines installed, thus removing carbon-sequestering
forests and increasing emissions.
Electricity produced by wind costs
2-3 times as much as conventional power.
There are also huge subsidies from
tax dollars, the main reason wind farms are being built today.
Wind farms produce a few temporary
jobs but almost no permanent ones.
Home values drop in the vicinity of
a turbine.
Ill effects of noise, low-frequency
sound waves, and “shadow flicker,” and the economic impact on tourism, have not
been completely studied.
Finally, what about esthetic
values, not just for tourism and the effect on pristine mountains, but for
themselves? Is it worth it?
Excerpted from Saving
Maine: A Personal Gazetteer