Here on Penobscot Bay
the bald eagle population is apparently growing rapidly. We wouldn't
necessarily know, for a sighting over here on the west side of the bay (away
from the islands where they wisely live) is rare, lasts maybe two seconds, and
is the occasion for wild whoops and comical gyrations as we press noses against
the windows to follow its flight out of sight. Its symbolism and mystery are
still strong, stirring up both patriotism and nostalgia, a gut wish for some
lost America .
It makes me think that people who
love Maine
are essentially conservative. We’re savers, we’d be completely for maintaining
the status quo if most of it weren’t so awful. (I’m pleased to report in this
regard that in late 2010, the discovery of an eagle’s nest scuttled, at least
temporarily, the state’s plans to build a bypass around Wiscasset and its
heroic traffic jams.) My dictionary says conservatism is “a political
philosophy based on tradition and social stability, stressing established
institutions, and preferring gradual development to abrupt change.” I’d agree
completely if all this were nature-based. But political conservatives focus on
institutions, not individuals, on the idea of a bald eagle and not the reality
of its fierce and independent beauty. And the works of humans, our DDT and our
mercury, are doubly dangerous: we nearly wiped out the eagles, and now that
they are returning, we have somehow changed them. On their island fortresses,
to which we have banished them, they are forsaking their traditional and
difficult diet of live fish and are feasting on easier prey, the chicks and
fledglings of the shore birds such as gulls and ducks and cormorants, and
because one of those cormorant species of Penobscot Bay, the great cormorant,
has so few members to begin with, it probably won’t last the decade.
Are humans to interfere again? Who's going to win, a
magnificent warlike raptor, the symbol of
Excerpted from Saving
Maine: A Personal Gazetteer
No comments:
Post a Comment